At 10:12 PM 11/27/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>No, that Crossobamon is most certainly a Crossobamon orientalis.  There is a
>form of Crossobamon orientalis with Stenodactylus chracateristics going
>around.  Many are calling these Stenodactylus doriae.  I personally feel
>these are incorrectly identified.  S. doriae has an extremely triangular
>snount.

That sounds like mine.  Flattened head, prominent triangular snout, 
somewhat of a low squarish body---if she's really a _Crossobamon_, then it 
has to be the most variable species I've *ever* heard of, in significant 
aspects of body shape as well as the petty stuff like markings.

What Glades had as _S. sthenodactylus_, it turns out, may be the same 
thing; they're too big to actually be _sthenodactylus_, and they 
purportedly have triangular upturned snouts.  Two are enroute to my 
doorstep as I write this; when they arrive I'll try to get some pictures of 
them and of the female I already have for comparison.

         NT

######################################################################
                THE GLOBAL GECKO ASSOCIATION LISTSERV
                  WebSite:  http://www.gekkota.com
 The GGA takes no responsibility for the contents of these postings. 
######################################################################

Reply via email to