Magnus,
Thanks for sharing your experience.
Did the study of relationships of Phelsuma cover all species and
subspecies? If so, was there anything published describing the various
realtionships? And were there any suggestions to revise the present
organization of species/sub species?
Any new discoveries or interesting bits of information as to Phelsuma
husbandry?
Thanks again, Yuri
> Magnus Forsberg wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A short summary from yearly meeting with Intressengruppe Phelsuma in
> G�ttingen(Germany).
>
> As allways was this years meeting a great one.During the two days you
> get the time to sit down
> and discuss Phelsuma with other freaks.The talks was very interesting
> and different temas made
> it even moore interesting.There were a some talks refering to
> traveling and looking for Phelsuma
> from Maruritius,Reunion and of course Madagascar.Some was about
> keeping and breeding different
> species as P.inexpectata.
> One that I found very interesting was a spech about the relationships
> between Phelsuma species.This was
> done totaly with DNA as conecting factor.Two things that was really
> surprising was that P.guim.rosagularis
> was not closest to P.guim.guimbeaui but to P.cepediana and the most
> surprising though was the close relationship
> between P.anamanensis and P.breviceps.
>
> Of course lots of Phelsumas was for sale.Among the species I could see
> were.P.hielscheri,P.guim.guimbeaui,
> P.inexpectata,P.quad.lepida,P.lineata
> subsp.,P.abb.sumptio,P.abb.checkei,P.nigristriata,P.astriata astriata,
> P.astriata semicarinata and a few moore.ALL OF COURS CAPTIVE BREED!!!!
>
> Magnus
###########################################################################
THE GLOBAL GECKO ASSOCIATION LISTSERV
WebSite: www.gekkota.com Archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
The GGA takes no responsibility for the contents of these postings.
###########################################################################
