On Monday 18 December 2006 18:00, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote: > I'm fine with that, although personally, I'd like more a GTK like > interface (I know it was my patch, and I didn't do it): > GList *o_selection_add(GList *head, OBJECT *o_selected); > GList *o_selection_remove(GList *head, OBJECT *o_selected); > GList *o_selection_unselect_list(TOPLEVEL *w_current, GList *head);
Fair enough. As I mentioned, the idea was to make them a bit more uniform, and it seemed like it would break more stuff if I did what you're suggesting. Another argument in favour of the **GList syntax is that it results in slightly less verbose function calls. :) Do you want me to resubmit a new patch, or shall we go ahead with this one? (n.b. I think patch 3/4 should go in regardless). Peter -- Fisher Society committee http://tinyurl.com/o39w2 CUSBC novices, match and league secretary http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9 CU Spaceflight http://tinyurl.com/ognu2 v3sw6YChw7$ln3pr6$ck3ma8u7+Lw3+2m0l7Ci6e4+8t4Gb8en6g6Pa2Xs5Mr4p4 hackerkey.com peter-b.co.uk
pgp0O3NGarWNQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
