On Monday 18 December 2006 22:33, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote: > Agree. I wonder if just mark those functions as deprecated, or go ahead > and remove it from the headers. If no other application is using them, why > not make now remove it at once? what people think?
There are other uses of the functions within libgeda (although I'm not sure there should be). Is there a 'private' libgeda header that they could go in? Peter -- Fisher Society committee http://tinyurl.com/o39w2 CUSBC novices, match and league secretary http://tinyurl.com/mwrc9 CU Spaceflight http://tinyurl.com/ognu2 v3sw6YChw7$ln3pr6$ck3ma8u7+Lw3+2m0l7Ci6e4+8t4Gb8en6g6Pa2Xs5Mr4p4 hackerkey.com peter-b.co.uk
pgpVSZPPQ1qZ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
