Hi Peter, El lun, 18-12-2006 a las 18:15 +0000, Peter TB Brett escribió: > On Monday 18 December 2006 18:00, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote: > > > I'm fine with that, although personally, I'd like more a GTK like > > interface (I know it was my patch, and I didn't do it): > > GList *o_selection_add(GList *head, OBJECT *o_selected); > > GList *o_selection_remove(GList *head, OBJECT *o_selected); > > GList *o_selection_unselect_list(TOPLEVEL *w_current, GList *head); > > Fair enough. As I mentioned, the idea was to make them a bit more uniform, > and > it seemed like it would break more stuff if I did what you're suggesting. > > Another argument in favour of the **GList syntax is that it results in > slightly less verbose function calls. :) > > Do you want me to resubmit a new patch, or shall we go ahead with this one?
I'm ok with this one. > (n.b. I think patch 3/4 should go in regardless). Agree. I wonder if just mark those functions as deprecated, or go ahead and remove it from the headers. If no other application is using them, why not make now remove it at once? what people think? Regards, Carlos _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
