On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 1:18 PM, al davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 March 2008 14:41, Newell Jensen wrote: > > Just curious, but how many people use xgsch2pcb presently? I am > > interested in hearing your reasons for either using it or not using > > it. > > I don't, even when I need to make that conversion. It offers no real > advantages over just running gsch2pcb, and a significant disadvantage, > which I will call "kick me". > > Just adding a graphic wrapper around one tool doesn't give me anything. > By adding a few buttons to push, usually in a routine, it makes the > interface worse. This is what I mean by "kick me". I need to kick it > to keep it going. > > A project manager needs to take care of that automatically, without > being kicked. I want to have a schematic, layout, and simulation, > smoothly without explicitly asking for every step of the conversion. > It's fine if there are several tools under the hood, but the user > should not need to kick it for every step and every choice.
If this was changed, would you use it? > > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev > -- Newell Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water After enlightenment, code and build circuits
_______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
