Peter Clifton wrote: > Thinking about it further, if our "confirm_dialog" were a more generic > "dialog_with_buttons", we could have still implemented the right > message, look and feel for this dialog - it might just take a lot of > options defining to describe _all_ the GTK look and feel, stock items > and icons etc..
I like putting the GUI in a shorthand form so users can redefine it. EDA users are very particular...aren't they? Another example of shorthand for code is how I'm learning to make web pages from restructuredtext, which via docutils, generates html, so you really only need to look at the easier on the eye restructuredtext when writing content, and CSS 2.1 files that give a look to your uniquely identified elements. Even the uniquely identifying part is done in restructuredtext not html... So if you all peek at my web site, you'll see it changing a lot in the next days... from a skeletal experiment to something I like, with content and an ecommerce section. And everything I learn on this one will speed the making of side activity sites spaceshipsupply.com, cottagematic.com autokiln.com, industromatic.com, foseda.com, cibolo.com, etc... The better to show off my multiple personalities. John Griessen -- Ecosensory Austin TX _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
