Hi Peter and all, [snip] > BSD translations can be re-licensed as GPL, but we might want to put a > copy of the BSD license text somewhere, mentioning that some > translations are / were originally BSD licensed, perhaps pointing back > to Launchpad where the tracking of which license each string is under is > kept. (Not that this information is actually displayed publically, but > they assure me the information is available if required). >
I can understand that new translation will start out BSD and we can just state that they are BSD licensed or dual licensed. However, how does this help our existing translations which are GPLed? Certainly we are not expected to upload our GPL licenced strings and then have them, through some sort of magic, get licensed as BSD? Maybe I'm missing something obvious here. -Ales _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
