Ales, Glad to hear you won't be signing it over!
If it ever became necessary to legally defend gEDA you could always sign of the copyright at that time. Matt On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 14:55:28 +0100, Egil Kvaleberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Timmerman, LJH wrote: > > >Besides, all things that have been said and have not been said about GPL and > >the FSF, __if__ there are any conflicts to be solved in a legal manner, the > >most simple solution is to have __one__ representative for gEDA and not > >several (dozens) of them. > > > >If the FSF is that representative that's OK with me, the decision is not up > >to me. > > > > > I do not want to advocate either way, I just want to note that the FSF > legal counsel is really top notch. What their position is in terms of > defending GNU-licensed software that is not copyright FSF I do not know > - they certainly do a good job with the stuff that is. > > Egil >
