Hi Ales, On Wednesday 02 November 2005 04:31, Ales Hvezda wrote: > I agree that update component should update the symversion attribute. > > However, I am not sure this is worth fixing, because if I go down the > path with a cryptographic signature, then the whole point of > symversion= because irrelavent (since any change will cause the > signature to change and the whole versioning becomes binary: change / > no change).
Yes, that's true. Just if you plan to make another release before implementing the signature, we should think about copying back an older version of the analog symbols I've changed (the warnings of changed capacitors are really annoying). regards Werner
