Hi Ales,
On Monday 07 November 2005 01:32, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> >Just if you plan to make another release before implementing the
> >signature, we should think about copying back an older version of
> > the analog symbols I've changed (the warnings of changed capacitors
> > are really annoying).
>
> I will most certainly make one more release before I even think
> about adding the symbol signature approach (which btw I still need to
> formalize; I'll do that and get comments before I do anything else).
> So, there are two short term choice (and I think either are okay):
>
> 1) As Werner suggested, fixing component update
>
> -or-
>
> 2) Revert some of the changes commonly used symbols.
>
> Werner, which of these would be the right thing to do?
I think we should not invest much work. So reverting the symbols is the
better choice.
I'll keep a backup of the changed symbols.
This is the log of the changed symbols:
---------------
User: werner
Date: 05/09/12 12:09:45
Modified: . aop-std-1.sym battery-1.sym battery-2.sym
battery-3.sym beeper-1.sym bridge-1.sym
bridge-2.sym capacitor-1.sym capacitor-2.sym
capacitor-3.sym capacitor-4.sym
capacitor-variable-1.sym
capacitor-variable-2.sym
coil-1.sym coil-2.sym crystal-1.sym CS5396-1.sym
dual-opamp-1.sym fuse-1.sym fuse-2.sym
glow-lamp-1.sym HA5221-1.sym inamp-1.sym
inductor-1.sym inductor-dot-1.sym led-1.sym
leddual-1.sym leddual-2.sym microphone-1.sym
nmos-1.sym opamp-1.sym opamp-2.sym pwrxfmr-1.sym
Log:
symbol rework in /analog
-------------------
regards
Werner
