> If you mean personally me, I did not.
> - Was this decision wrong or not? > - If it was wrong, should we approve all people who wants to be a > member of the admin or developer team? > - If you consider rejection of some persons to be wrong, let's discuss > that/them. At least one of the people directly involved said he agreed with the rejection. Unless one of the rejected people has a specific complaint and can show that he's been doing admin tasks all along, I don't see any real problems. So if someone who's not active on the lists and hasn't shown any project leadership asks for admin, IMHO it's right to say "no". That doesn't mean "stop trying", it might just mean "not yet". Remember, the admin list is a list of people who *own* the project on LP. If someone had been coordinating releases, helping developers, and overall doing the job of an admin, and was highly active, and asked for admin and was rejected . . . then we'd have a problem. But at the moment my top priority is to grow the developers group, not the admins group. Once we have enough developers that we need a formal "steering committee" type of admin group, I'll worry about that then. Meanwhile, my policy for the developers list is simple - if you have git commit privs anywhere on gedaproject.org, you should be on the developers list. With Markus's new "junior developer" feature we should be able to be more lenient with adding developers. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
