On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:53:08AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: ... > > - Was this decision wrong or not? > > - If it was wrong, should we approve all people who wants to be a > > member of the admin or developer team? > > - If you consider rejection of some persons to be wrong, let's discuss > > that/them. > > At least one of the people directly involved said he agreed with the > rejection. Unless one of the rejected people has a specific complaint > and can show that he's been doing admin tasks all along, I don't see > any real problems. > > So if someone who's not active on the lists and hasn't shown any > project leadership asks for admin, IMHO it's right to say "no". That > doesn't mean "stop trying", it might just mean "not yet". Remember, > the admin list is a list of people who *own* the project on LP. > > If someone had been coordinating releases, helping developers, and > overall doing the job of an admin, and was highly active, and asked > for admin and was rejected . . . then we'd have a problem. > > But at the moment my top priority is to grow the developers group, not > the admins group. Once we have enough developers that we need a > formal "steering committee" type of admin group, I'll worry about that > then. > > Meanwhile, my policy for the developers list is simple - if you have > git commit privs anywhere on gedaproject.org, you should be on the > developers list. With Markus's new "junior developer" feature we > should be able to be more lenient with adding developers.
OK, I'm fully agreed. Thanks, Vladimir -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~geda-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
