Ben, I don't see anything inherently wrong. But it is probably a little dated. Were you using my doc?
For today's capabilities I would suggest that instead of working in units of mills you work in units of 0.01 mills. I won't or don't have time to check it for correctness otherwise. But you seem to be on the right tract. Steve Meier Ben Jackson wrote: > I created this for LT1764A and friends, it's a DD5. This is exactly their > recommended footprint, plus an outline I made up. It's very tight to the > part, more so than some I looked at on professionally made boards using > the same package. > > I did test-fit the part on a 1:1 printout. > > I initially set the mask and clearance manually, but then I took them out > and accepted the default, since I have no experience tuning those. > > # author: Ben Jackson > # email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # dist-license: GPL 2 > # use-license: unlimited > # reference: http://www.linear.com/designtools/packaging/ddpak/Q_DD5.pdf > Element(0x0 "5-Lead Plastic DD Pak" "U1" "" -20 -650 0 100 0x0) > ( > Pad(-134 -21 -134 -69 42 "1" "1" 0x0100) > Pad(-67 -21 -67 -69 42 "2" "2" 0x0100) > Pad(0 -21 0 -69 42 "3" "3" 0x0100) > Pad(67 -21 67 -69 42 "4" "4" 0x0100) > Pad(134 -21 134 -69 42 "5" "5" 0x0100) > Pad(-35 -390 35 -390 350 "tab" "6" 0x0100) > ElementLine(-230 -195 -230 -585 10) > ElementLine(230 -195 230 -585 10) > ElementLine(-230 -585 230 -585 10) > ElementLine(-230 -195 230 -195 10) > ) > > _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
