On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:47:42PM -0700, Steve Meier wrote: > > I don't see anything inherently wrong. But it is probably a little > dated. Were you using my doc?
Yes, I was using one updated by Stuart Brorson. > For today's capabilities I would suggest that instead of working in > units of mills you work in units of 0.01 mills. I didn't need to place anything on a sub-mil location, so I didn't use that. Is there another advantage? I also removed the clearance/mask parameters and let them default, since I saw other footprints doing it. -- Ben Jackson AD7GD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ben.com/ _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
