On Sep 13, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Duncan Drennan wrote: >> No connects aren't errors: real circuits have lots of them. >> >> And I can't find the real errors through the fog of non-errors. Its >> whole model of input, output, power, etc. is really only applicable >> if you're using a single digital technology and nothing else. > > I've only really worked with PCAD and an old DOS version of ORCAD, but > the output from them was pretty similar. > > What exactly do you expect it to do? What kind of errors do you want > it to throw?
If I knew how to make it useful, I'd do so: gnetlist back ends aren't hard. But to be useful, it'd have to read my mind. There's no way to tell a good circuit from a bad one unless you understand what it's supposed to *do*. And even then, it isn't a matter of simple predicates... John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
