On 9/13/07, Carlos Nieves Ónega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El jue, 13-09-2007 a las 15:33 -0400, John Doty escribió: > > On Sep 13, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Carlos Nieves Ónega wrote:
> > I'm the one complaining about DRC. But my complaint isn't that it's > > buggy: my complaint is that it is a source of newbie confusion, and > > not especially useful at finding actual problems. > > That's your opinion, and it depends of what you are doing and how you > use (or want to use) it. > Mine is that any check, even a bad and incomplete one, is better than > none (specially for newbies). If you fill the screen (or logfile) with false-positves it can make it very difficult to find the few true-positives (especially for newbies). Without detailed and accurate documentation it is very hard to tweak the tool to get useful information from it (especially for newbies that can't find the documentation ;-) (* jcl *) P.S. This is where open-source and ASCII files do help. If you really need to tweak the tool you can. -- http://www.luciani.org _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
