On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Anthony Shanks<[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I know exactly what you mean now and I have seen (and have used) > that kind of hierarchy control present in very high end tools (like > cadence)
Sorry, I should have guessed you don't need this kind of explanation. Looks like we are coming from similar background. > but it is usually at the schematic capture level like you > stated rather at the netlister level. gschem would have to drastically > change to support that level of hierarchical maniuplation. That would be great but I wouldn't expect such change to occur any time soon. Even if we prepared a patch it would probably have to be maintained separately. Cheers, -r. _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
