On 7/14/10 10:51 PM, timecop wrote:
>> I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual
>> *licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive. I'd
>> like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement
>> is that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need
>> to be in open, documented formats.
>
> Keep dreaming, bro.
> Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.
Damn, and here I was hoping he had unsubscribed.
Go design a circuit or something, if you can. Use Protel, so maybe
you'll get something done, huh?
-Dave
...most decidedly having a "zero asshole tolerance" day
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
