Man, what are you doing here?
Read up and steal ideas to incorporate in proprietary tools?
Try snatch bits of wisdome to patent denying prior art?
timecop wrote:
I think that the proper place to resolve this issue is in the actual
*licenses,* which as with OSS may vary from permissive to restrictive. I'd
like to see the evolution of at least one OSHW license where a requirement is
that the design files for the project-- and its derivative works --need to be
in open, documented formats.
Keep dreaming, bro.
Maybe when gEDA reaches 1/10th the functionality/usability of say Protel.
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
