timecop wrote: > I don't actually use Protel
I did for five years at my day job -- protel98SE to be exact. There were some very useful features that geda/pcb still misses. However, the match is much closer than the suggested 1:10. In fact, there are some critical areas where the open source alternative wins hands down. * true polygons rather than a shaky hatching procedure * no data loss due to data base failure. * works on lin, win and mac rather than confined to windows * integrates nicely with versioning systems ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53 _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
