Stefan,
I use the spice-sdb back end for gnetlist.
I was having some problems with simulating a circuit with a "floating"
ground. It turns out when I set it up in LTSpice (which I run under
Wine on OS X) it works fine. That is, I manually enter the schematic
and components into the GUI frontend.
So the most likely explanations are, I have an error in my schematic
that I am not spotting, or the spice-sdb is outputting something that
is upsetting LTSpice. The truth of the matter is I have modified the
spice-sdb scheme file, so I may have made a boo-boo.
Oliver
__________________________________________________________________
From: Stefan Salewski <[email protected]>
To: gEDA user mailing list <[email protected]>
Sent: Sat, January 1, 2011 5:53:23 AM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: TI-TINA Spice and gEDA
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 16:30 -0800, Oliver King-Smith wrote:
> I have been having problems with LTSpice simulating some components
> from TI.
Why, what was not working? LTSpice with wine and Linux?
> I was thinking of looking at TINA-TI spice program. Has
> anyone tried going from gschem to TINA?
So gschem -> LTSpice works fine? How did you do it?
I have tried TINA-TI once with Windows-XP -- not too bad for evaluating
properties missing in the datasheet. But you can not really trust the
spice models, one was very wrong. You may still find my problem
mentioned in sci.electronics.design, but they have fixed it now.
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[1][email protected]
[2]http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
References
1. mailto:[email protected]
2. http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
