On 2010-04-23 17:25, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> cyrille henry wrote:
>> not yet!
> 
> 
> 
> i've seen that too.
> i think, just running "make" again, fixes the problem.
> (it's not good enough for autobuild though...)


hmm, i'm not sure, but i think the problem lies in the
/usr/lib/libaviplay.la file provided by libavifile-0.7-dev
it explicitely refers to /usr/lib/liba52.la, which is not present on
your system.

on debian, this has been "fixed" with "libavifile-0.7-dev
1:0.7.48~20090503.ds-1", where all the .la files from libavifile have
been dumped (deleted), so they don't interfere anymore with libtool.

on ubuntu, this fix only made it into >=lucid. (the karmic version is
1:0.7.47.20070718-1.2ubuntu1(!))

for now, the only "clean" possibility i see to circumvent this problem,
is to install liba52-0.7.4-dev, which will provide /usr/lib/liba52.la


fmgasdr
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

Reply via email to