-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/14/2011 06:58 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > Do you really think that it's a good idea to use a loader in this manner ?
yes. the idea is to make 3rd party plugins integrate seamlessly into Gem. > > What is the possibility of nameclashes here ? > obviously it's there. e.g. there is a frei0r plugin called "multiply", which could be accessed as [pix_multiply]. since [pix_multiply] is already built into Gem, you will never get the frei0r plugin this way, you have to explicitely use [pix_frei0r multiply] (btw, [pix_frei0r multiply] won't do either, simply because this plugin is a mixer, which is currently unsupported by Gem's frei0r implementation) fgmadr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZfSsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvT9MQCeOL1G4qrIspoYoGNt6yO/buXl eu8AoI0Zkssel5dVMk98EGsxY3CbFZYH =S1HC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
