On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
e.g. there is a frei0r plugin called "multiply", which could be accessed as [pix_multiply]. since [pix_multiply] is already built into Gem, you will never get the frei0r plugin this way, you have to explicitely use [pix_frei0r multiply]
also PdVjTools' [pix_preview] vs FreeFrame's [pix_preview]. I just saw this by trying to load PdVjTools' pix_preview-help.pd without compiling the actual external.
but I'm not looking into making a list, I'm looking into not causing nameclashes by importing names from people who have no idea about the existence of the [pix_...] namespace in Pd/Gem (because they don't use Pd, for example).
is it a good idea to have seamless integration ? _______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
