Le 02/09/13 12:55, Cyrille Henry a écrit :
yes, we can imaging extending this objects collection for vertex, or
with function that is not yet possible with pix_ object.
so having pix_ prefix on this objects is not a good idea imo.
What I had in mind is :
[pix_*_sl] ONLY for glsl abstraction that replace a corresponding
[pix_*] object
and for example
[vertex_*_sl for shader dealing with vertex.
This way the abstractions are classed by fonctionnality instead of
method (glsl).
But I get your point and it's surely easier your way.
Nevertheless, one can ask is [glsl_alpha] a replacement for [alpha] or
[pix_alpha]?
Best,
n
texture_alpha / texture_add / ...
vertex_random / ...
--
http://www.nimon.org
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
