----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/#review1395 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/arch/x86/utility.cc <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/#comment1834> I can change the comment to -- // This function assumes that the registers are consistent amongst themselves. Hence, side effects affecting the registers themselves need not be taken care of. But any other side effects, like TLB invalidation, would need to be. - Nilay On 2011-07-07 07:59:18, Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-07-07 07:59:18) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > x86: Implements copyRegs() function > The copyRegs() function for x86 is currently unimplemented. This patch > provides an implementation. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/x86/utility.cc fad37c6670a6 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/759/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
