-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/799/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and Nathan 
Binkert.


Summary
-------

O3: Get rid of the raw ExtMachInst constructor on DynInsts.

This constructor assumes that the ExtMachInst can be decoded directly into a
StaticInst that's useful to execute. With the advent of microcoded
instructions that's no longer true.


Diffs
-----

  src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh 82ff928182c5 
  src/cpu/base_dyn_inst_impl.hh 82ff928182c5 
  src/cpu/o3/dyn_inst.hh 82ff928182c5 
  src/cpu/o3/dyn_inst_impl.hh 82ff928182c5 
  src/cpu/ozone/dyn_inst_impl.hh 82ff928182c5 

Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/799/diff


Testing
-------


Thanks,

Gabe

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to