Just to be clear, do you want me to update this change or are you
incorporating it into a future change?

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Gabe Black <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 08/14/11 21:56, Korey Sewell wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Gabe Black <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> The skid buffer doesn't really have anything to do with it. Instructions
> >> are on the wire from fetch when the squash comes. Because they aren't
> >> actually in one stage or another they keep coming. By the time they
> >> arrive, decode isn't processing any more instructions since it's waiting
> >> for the squash to finish.
> > Which is why you should always sort the incoming instructions before you
> > actually process them, no? That sort, will either block them (putting
> them
> > in the skidBuffer) or let them be, right?
> >
>
> I don't know. As I said, I didn't have time to dig around in decode to
> figure it out. If that's what we should do then go ahead.
>
> Gabe
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>



-- 
- Korey
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to