Yeah, there are two. http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/828/ http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/829/
Gabe On 09/04/11 09:31, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > Sorry, I think I was on vacation and missed some of this... Is there a patch > on reviewboard to look at? > On Sep 3, 2011 10:26 PM, "Gabriel Michael Black" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Does anybody have an opinion on this? If somebody wants me to wait I >> can, but if not I'd like to get this checked in. >> >> Gabe >> >> Quoting Gabe Black <[email protected]>: >> >>> I definitely intend to do more along these lines, I haven't had a chance >>> in a while and these have been sitting around. I want to get them moving >>> now that the X86_FS O3 regression is in so the don't bit rot too badly. >>> >>> One thing I didn't mention in the commit message for the decoder change >>> was that this is also a transitional step to combine SE and FS. i'm >>> thinking there will be some state in the decoder which will make it >>> return SE or FS flavors of instructions, which more or less just boils >>> down to the system call instructions and maybe one or two others. Right >>> now these tend to be preprocessor based decisions "#if FULL_SYSTEM" but >>> they could be compile time constant decisions "if (FULL_SYSTEM)" or even >>> run time if FS and SE coexist "if (fullSystem)". fullSystem or something >>> like it would live in the decoder and (I'm imagining) be in scope in the >>> decode function. >>> >>> Gabe >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gem5-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
