-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/979/#review1899
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Sounds fine to me!

- Steve


On 2012-01-10 09:16:24, Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/979/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-01-10 09:16:24)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> MEM: Differentiate functional cache accesses from CPU and memory
> 
> This patch changes the functionalAccess member function in the cache
> model such that it is aware of what port the access came from, i.e. if
> it came from the CPU side or from the memory side. By adding this
> information, it is possible to respect the 'forwardSnoops' flag for
> snooping requests coming from the memory side and not forward
> them. This fixes an outstanding issue with the IO bus getting accesses
> that have no valid destination port and also cleans up future changes
> to the bus model.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/cache.hh a1d5a0e2e970 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh a1d5a0e2e970 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/979/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to