ARM_FS/tests/opt/long/10.linux-boot/arm/linux/realview-o3/ compile time: host_seconds 840.68 # Real time elapsed on the host
run time: host_seconds 840.02 # Real time elapsed on the host ARM_FS/tests/opt/long/10.linux-boot/arm/linux/realview-o3/ compile time: host_seconds 34.50 # Real time elapsed on the host run time: host_seconds 33.11 # Real time elapsed on the host build/X86_SE/tests/opt/long/70.twolf/x86/linux/simple-atomic/ compile time: host_seconds 87.55 # Real time elapsed on the host host_seconds 93.78 # Real time elapsed on the host run time: host_seconds 103.96 # Real time elapsed on the host host_seconds 100.22 # Real time elapsed on the host One thing which surprised me is that choosing SE/FS mode at runtime performed better than choosing it at compile time on ARM_FS, although there was more overhead on X86_SE. I'm not really sure why that's happening. It could be an SE vs. FS thing somehow. Gabe _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
