On Jan 28, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Gabe Black wrote: > I notice there are still remnants of old port types floating around the > code base. For instance, there are lots of declarations of classes that > no longer exist and aren't actually used. grepping for FunctionalPort, > for instance, comes up with a handful of examples. It also shows that > FunctionalPort is still used in SPARC's vtophys.hh, likely meaning that > SPARC_FS won't compile now. > > It would be great if someone (I nominate Andreas) goes and cleans up the > cruft. It's very important that somebody fixes SPARC_FS if it's indeed > broken. Since I don't know how the new port stuff is supposed to work, I > again nominate Andreas. > > Gabe
The SPARC_FS regression still passes. They're just forward declarations for the FunctionalPort class and a prototype that doesn't actually exist in the source code (not to say that it they shouldn't be removed). Ali _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
