> On Feb. 21, 2012, 2:50 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > src/arch/arm/stacktrace.cc, line 115 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1054/diff/1/?file=23546#file23546line115> > > > > I'm assuming this is copied from Alpha. It's probably not appropriate > > for ARM.
This is the same for MIPS/Alpha/x86. I don't really know why "console" is assumed in this case. So, I left it. > On Feb. 21, 2012, 2:50 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > src/arch/arm/stacktrace.cc, line 80 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1054/diff/1/?file=23546#file23546line80> > > > > Is this value correct, or is it just what Alpha used? You may be right. I just copied this value and it worked, i.e., I could get the process's name. I'll see if I can find the kernel base address for the RealView type of system modeled in gem5. Unless anybody knows it offhand? Ali? - Anthony ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1054/#review2167 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Feb. 20, 2012, 5:17 p.m., Anthony Gutierrez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1054/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 20, 2012, 5:17 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 8849:bdd7f776a182 > --------------------------- > ARM: implement the ProcessInfo methods > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/arm/stacktrace.cc UNKNOWN > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1054/diff/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Anthony Gutierrez > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
