> On March 26, 2012, 3:23 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > Is it not possible to use the Ruby sequencers for all the connections to > > the DMA devices, i.e. config, pio and dma?
I think Ruby, as of now, cannot allow pio accesses to flow through it. I have talked to Brad about this before, and it seems to me that current implementation would have to be enhanced. I don't know what config port is about. - Nilay ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1102/#review2378 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 24, 2012, 1:27 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1102/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 24, 2012, 1:27 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 8918:e1988ccf8001 > --------------------------- > Ruby X86: problem in setting DMA port, related to the changeset 8850 > I think since the dma port is assigned twice (once in SouthBridge.py, > and once by Ruby somewhere) an extra port gets created which has no > peer port. This results in a segmentation fault when a simulation is > started. The posted patch solves the problem, but it is not the > solution I am looking for. Andreas, do you have some idea how to > handle this issue? > > > Diffs > ----- > > configs/common/FSConfig.py 7d95b650c9b6 > src/dev/x86/Pc.py 7d95b650c9b6 > src/dev/x86/SouthBridge.py 7d95b650c9b6 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1102/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
