I had more try on gem-stable. For ALPHA_FS binary, the execution results are 
correct. 
While for binary ALPHA_MOESI_hammer generated by command "scons 
build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/gem5.opt PROTOCOL = MOESI_hammer RUBY=true",
the execution results are wrong. 

Can anyone look into this too?
 
Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
GE ZHIGUO
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes

Hi,  I just ran using gem5-stable version and the outputs are correct.
I think that bugs were introduced in gem-dev version.

Thanks!

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of GE ZHIGUO
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 11:31 AM
To: gem5 users mailing list
Subject: [gem5-users] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes

Hi, I ran blackscholes in PARSEC Benchmark using GEM5 FS Alpha. However, the 
execution results are not correct.
I tried configurations of 4 processors, 1 processors, and Ruby, non Ruby.  The 
outputs are the same which is not right.
When executing the benchmark, there are some warnings like:
warn: mult/sud   f14,f12,f10: non-standard trapping mode not supported.

The followings are the outputs from GEM5.

16

3.762516736984252930

-0.188307821750640869

2.030249118804931641

6.907309055328369141

0.930330634117126465

10.893478393554687500

14.152964591979980469

19.959602355957031250

1.463889837265014648

4.625942230224609375

8.334403991699218750

-0.032770160585641861

-0.083193600177764893

3.999399185180664062

10.102209091186523438

12.887604713439941406



The correct outputs are:

16

4.759420394897460938

0.808597564697265625

3.714603424072265625

8.591663360595703125

2.133378982543945312

10.895606994628906250

14.421577453613281250

18.630859375000000000

1.814987182617187500

5.850273132324218750

10.308151245117187500

0.003523707389831543

1.140726089477539062


Anyone encountered same problem? Can anyone help?
Thanks!











_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to