You may try a binary search in changesets to find the problematic revision On 6/5/12, GE ZHIGUO <[email protected]> wrote: > I had more try on gem-stable. For ALPHA_FS binary, the execution results are > correct. > While for binary ALPHA_MOESI_hammer generated by command "scons > build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/gem5.opt PROTOCOL = MOESI_hammer RUBY=true", > the execution results are wrong. > > Can anyone look into this too? > > Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of GE ZHIGUO > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes > > Hi, I just ran using gem5-stable version and the outputs are correct. > I think that bugs were introduced in gem-dev version. > > Thanks! > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of GE ZHIGUO > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 11:31 AM > To: gem5 users mailing list > Subject: [gem5-users] GEM5 outputs are not right for PARSEC blackscholes > > Hi, I ran blackscholes in PARSEC Benchmark using GEM5 FS Alpha. However, the > execution results are not correct. > I tried configurations of 4 processors, 1 processors, and Ruby, non Ruby. > The outputs are the same which is not right. > When executing the benchmark, there are some warnings like: > warn: mult/sud f14,f12,f10: non-standard trapping mode not supported. > > The followings are the outputs from GEM5. > > 16 > > 3.762516736984252930 > > -0.188307821750640869 > > 2.030249118804931641 > > 6.907309055328369141 > > 0.930330634117126465 > > 10.893478393554687500 > > 14.152964591979980469 > > 19.959602355957031250 > > 1.463889837265014648 > > 4.625942230224609375 > > 8.334403991699218750 > > -0.032770160585641861 > > -0.083193600177764893 > > 3.999399185180664062 > > 10.102209091186523438 > > 12.887604713439941406 > > > > The correct outputs are: > > 16 > > 4.759420394897460938 > > 0.808597564697265625 > > 3.714603424072265625 > > 8.591663360595703125 > > 2.133378982543945312 > > 10.895606994628906250 > > 14.421577453613281250 > > 18.630859375000000000 > > 1.814987182617187500 > > 5.850273132324218750 > > 10.308151245117187500 > > 0.003523707389831543 > > 1.140726089477539062 > > > Anyone encountered same problem? Can anyone help? > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev >
-- // Naderan *Mahmood; _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
