Hey Marc.  I can take care of this.  Let's talk about this offline.

Brad



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Marc Orr
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 2:30 PM
> To: Marc Orr; Ali Saidi; Default; Steve Reinhardt; Gabe Black
> Subject: Re: [gem5-dev] Review Request: x86 syscall emulation: Add the
> TCGETS ioctl to the whitelist of tty ioctls that
> 
> Polling again :-).
> Thanks,
> Marc
> 
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Marc Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Any more thoughts on this patch?
> > Thanks,
> > Marc
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Marc Orr <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>    This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> >> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1187/
> >>   Review request for Default.
> >> By Marc Orr.
> >>
> >> *Updated May 20, 2012, 8:52 p.m.*
> >> Description (updated)
> >>
> >> Changeset 8979:c1ce40553d90
> >> ---------------------------
> >> x86 syscall emulation: Add the TCGETS ioctl to the whitelist of tty
> >> ioctls that return -ENOTTY.
> >>
> >> This patch is a revised version of Vince Weaver's  patch from 589.
> >>
> >>   Testing
> >>
> >> Ran perlbench to confirm that that the workload is not held up by this 
> >> ioctl.
> Furthermore, ran all spec workloads as best I could to confirm that there are 
> no
> more ioctls called from them. Some of the inputs available to me were too
> large to run all workloads to completion. Also, some of workloads fail due to
> other causes. But I am fairly confident that this is the only ioctl that was 
> causing
> problems.
> >>
> >> Also, ran the regression tester to confirm that everything compiles. I 
> >> still
> need to examine the output a little more carefully to make sure everything
> passes.
> >>
> >>   Diffs (updated)
> >>
> >>    - src/arch/alpha/linux/linux.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/alpha/tru64/tru64.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/arm/linux/linux.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/mips/linux/linux.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/power/linux/linux.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/x86/linux/linux.hh
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc
> >>    (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/kern/linux/linux.hh (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>    - src/sim/syscall_emul.hh
> >> (4388495beb44ba859d20177371caf9e14902ef91)
> >>
> >> View Diff <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1187/diff/>
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev


_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to