> On July 8, 2012, 10:16 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote: > > There is something in teh STL that valgrind thinks is an error? > > > >
I don't know for sure. This is a patch developed by Joel Hestness a couple years ago that has been sitting around in our patch queue. Since Joel didn't respond, I decided to just drop the patch. - Brad ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1289/#review3070 ----------------------------------------------------------- On July 2, 2012, 10:43 p.m., Brad Beckmann wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1289/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 2, 2012, 10:43 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9077:504d8cfa6ff3 > --------------------------- > Valgrind Suppressions: update to support common STL optimizations > > > Diffs > ----- > > util/valgrind-suppressions d8e5ca139d7c24eeb665ac0aab41e180886278cb > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1289/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Brad Beckmann > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
