-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1311/#review3153
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


seems fine to me... this Simulate.py is a mess and it doesn't make it worse.

- Ali Saidi


On July 23, 2012, 5:39 p.m., Anthony Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1311/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 23, 2012, 5:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9130:75db2cd47361
> ---------------------------
> configs: add option for repeatedly switching back-and-forth between cpu types.
> 
> This patch adds a --repeat-switch option that will enable repeat core
> switching at a user defined period (set with --switch-freq option).
> currently, a switch can only occur between like CPU types. inorder CPU
> switching is not supported.
> 
> *note*
> this patch simply allows a config that will perform repeat switching, it
> does not fix drain/switchout functionality. if you run with repeat switching
> you will hit assertion failures and/or your workload with hang or die.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/Options.py b57966a6c51249cf17fb9633a00d055fc260d72b 
>   configs/common/Simulation.py b57966a6c51249cf17fb9633a00d055fc260d72b 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1311/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> The options added to this config play nicely with the other options.
> Ran with repeat switching on with various other options. Simulation
> started and ran successfully while switching until an assertion failed
> or the workload kernel panicked or hung due to drain/switchout bugs.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony Gutierrez
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to