> On Aug. 25, 2012, 2:07 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > Any comments on the testing? Looks good overall.

It passes the quick regression tests, at least.  I don't think any of them 
actually catch the previous bug either, but as far as I can tell it didn't 
break anything new.


- Lena


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1294/#review3319
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 24, 2012, 7:31 p.m., Lena Olson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1294/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 24, 2012, 7:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9167:1bd0c85445a2
> ---------------------------
> Cache: Split invalidateBlk up to seperate block vs. tags
> 
> This seperates the functionality to clear the state in a block into blk.hh and
> the functionality to udpate the tag information into the tags.  This gets rid 
> of
> the case where calling invalidateBlk on an already-invalid block does 
> something
> different than calling it on a valid block, which was confusing.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/blk.hh 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.hh 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/fa_lru.cc 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/iic.hh 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/iic.cc 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.hh 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
>   src/mem/cache/tags/lru.cc 1d983855df2c941655cda665056c6b3a8bd3d463 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1294/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lena Olson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to