Let's switch that one as well then :) Perhaps we need another religious discussion of whether an Addr is just an absolute single value or if it can also denote a relative value as for the size.
Andreas On 26/08/2012 07:03, "Nilay Vaish" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Sun, 26 Aug 2012, Andreas Hansson wrote: > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1373/#review3328 >> ----------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> src/mem/ruby/system/MemoryVector.hh >> <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1373/#comment3426> >> >> If we want to align this with the rest of gem5 then the type should >> be Addr (which is typedef'ed to uint64_t). Perhaps a good idea to take >> the hit and change the memory-size related things to Addr? >> >> > >I think size is expressed as a uint64_t. I checked src/mem/physical.hh. > >-- >Nilay > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
