On Tue, January 29, 2013 11:25 am, Michael Levenhagen wrote:
> I think I've found a couple of bugs.
>
> Mike
>
> diff -r f9e76b1eb79a src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc
> --- a/src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc    Tue Jan 22 00:13:28 2013 -0600
> +++ b/src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc    Tue Jan 29 10:22:31 2013 -0700
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
>      /*  93 */ SyscallDesc("fchown", unimplementedFunc),
>      /*  94 */ SyscallDesc("lchown", unimplementedFunc),
>      /*  95 */ SyscallDesc("umask", unimplementedFunc),
> -    /*  96 */ SyscallDesc("gettimeofday", unimplementedFunc),
> +    /*  96 */ SyscallDesc("gettimeofday", gettimeofdayFunc<X86Linux64>),
>      /*  97 */ SyscallDesc("getrlimit", getrlimitFunc<X86Linux64>),
>      /*  98 */ SyscallDesc("getrusage", getrusageFunc<X86Linux64>),
>      /*  99 */ SyscallDesc("sysinfo", sysinfoFunc<X86Linux64>),
> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@
>      /* 107 */ SyscallDesc("geteuid", geteuidFunc),
>      /* 108 */ SyscallDesc("getegid", getegidFunc),
>      /* 109 */ SyscallDesc("setpgid", unimplementedFunc),
> -    /* 110 */ SyscallDesc("getppid", unimplementedFunc),
> +    /* 110 */ SyscallDesc("getppid", getppidFunc),
>      /* 111 */ SyscallDesc("getpgrp", unimplementedFunc),
>      /* 112 */ SyscallDesc("setsid", unimplementedFunc),
>      /* 113 */ SyscallDesc("setreuid", unimplementedFunc),
> diff -r f9e76b1eb79a src/arch/x86/process.cc
> --- a/src/arch/x86/process.cc   Tue Jan 22 00:13:28 2013 -0600
> +++ b/src/arch/x86/process.cc   Tue Jan 29 10:22:31 2013 -0700
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
>      vsyscallPage.base = 0xffffffffff600000ULL;
>      vsyscallPage.size = VMPageSize;
>      vsyscallPage.vtimeOffset = 0x400;
> -    vsyscallPage.vgettimeofdayOffset = 0x410;
> +    vsyscallPage.vgettimeofdayOffset = 0x000;
>
>      // Set up stack. On X86_64 Linux, stack goes from the top of memory
>      // downward, less the hole for the kernel address space plus one page
>
>

The first two changes seem fine. Can you elaborate on the change to
process.cc? What was the problem that you faced and how does this change
solves it?

--
Nilay

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to