-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1817/#review4205
-----------------------------------------------------------


I am not sure if this is required. Which revision are you working with?

- Nilay Vaish


On April 7, 2013, 8:58 p.m., Joel Hestness wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1817/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 7, 2013, 8:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9634:4a87fbab0988
> ---------------------------
> Sequencers: Reset clocks after cache warmup/cooldown
> 
> Sequencers can be accessed by CPU cores after cache warm-up or cool-down but
> before their clocks have been reset in normal simulation, which can cause
> MessageBuffer assertion failures that the enqueue time of a message is later
> than the send time. This change ensures that the Sequencer clocks are reset
> after warm-up and cool-down to avoid this problem.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/ruby/recorder/CacheRecorder.hh fa31189e1fb5 
>   src/mem/ruby/recorder/CacheRecorder.cc fa31189e1fb5 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.hh fa31189e1fb5 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/System.cc fa31189e1fb5 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1817/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Numerous checkpoint restore tests with x86 + Ruby
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joel Hestness
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to