-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/#review4325
-----------------------------------------------------------


Hi Taylor,

It looks quite good and is very well documented. Thanks! There are a couple of 
gem5 style things that we need to correct. If you want to take care of them 
that is great, if not whomever commits the code can do it. I've commented on an 
instance of these below.

Thanks again,
Ali





src/cpu/pred/global.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/#comment4079>

    please put authors on a separate line
    



src/cpu/pred/global.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/#comment4082>

    please put the type on a separate line from the method name.
    



src/cpu/pred/global.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/#comment4080>

    the indenting here should be fixed



src/cpu/pred/global.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/#comment4081>

    please put a space between if and (taken)


- Ali Saidi


On May 10, 2013, 10:29 a.m., Taylor Lloyd wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 10, 2013, 10:29 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a global-global (gAG) branch predictor, used by specifying 
> the "global" predType.
> From BranchPredictor, it uses the following variables for configuration: 
>  - globalPredictorSize
>  - globalCtrBits
>  - globalHistoryBits
> 
> As such, it may conflict with the ongoing effort to factor out the redundant 
> variable in the predictors.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/pred/SConscript 00dca8a9b560 
>   src/cpu/pred/bpred_unit.cc 00dca8a9b560 
>   src/cpu/pred/global.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/cpu/pred/global.cc PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1865/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Prior to submission, this was tested by building build/ARM/gem5.debug, and 
> run against a subset of the SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks. Statistics generated 
> seem valid, and it caused no execution errors.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Taylor Lloyd
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to