> On April 18, 2013, 3:52 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/mem/coherent_bus.hh, line 134
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1826/diff/1/?file=35127#file35127line134>
> >
> >     I'm not thrilled at how it's done at the moment, but I can see the need 
> > for something similar.
> >     
> >     I have quite some bus patches in the pipeline, I'll try and get them on 
> > the reviewboard early next week.
> 
> Xiangyu Dong wrote:
>     before the bus patch release, I will leave it as is.
> 
> Andreas Hansson wrote:
>     Great, I'll try and get those patches on the board next week.
>     
>     Thanks again for the very useful additions to the cache model.

Hi Andreas.  I've updated this changeset to work with your new multi-layer bus 
model.


- Xiangyu


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1826/#review4247
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 30, 2013, 10:41 p.m., Xiangyu Dong wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1826/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2013, 10:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9639:2aae67c49743
> ---------------------------
> mem: add retry mechanism for cache fills in classic cache model
> The changeset 6122d201ff80 modeled the cache bank and blocks the cache access
> if the target bank is busy.  However, due to the lack of retry mechanism at 
> the
> cache master port, that changeset cannot properly blocks the cache traffic 
> that
> is towards CPU.
> This patch modifies the CoherentBus model and adds a flow control scheme to 
> the
> RespLayer.  With this modification, cache fill operations can now be properly
> modeled.
> @todo The modification to CoherentBus is a little hacky. e.g. The recvRetry
> functions for Req and Resp are not symmetric
> @todo Might also need to modify noncoherent bus
> @todo There is no write buffer entries for cache fill operations. An
>       incremental patch will be needed to model the cache fill buffer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/cache/base.hh e2fafd224f43 
>   src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh e2fafd224f43 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.hh e2fafd224f43 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.cc e2fafd224f43 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1826/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Xiangyu Dong
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to