-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#review4620
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/cpu/reg_class.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#comment4358>

    clang static analysis will complain on this last comma



src/cpu/reg_class.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#comment4361>

    Worth putting in a doxy file?



src/cpu/reg_class.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#comment4360>

    regIdxToClass?



src/cpu/reg_class.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#comment4359>

    NULL please, once again, the static analysis will flag it



src/cpu/reg_class.cc
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/#comment4362>

    the trailing semicolon should not be there...I think


Some very minor things. For the rest it looks sensible to me.

- Andreas Hansson


On Aug. 22, 2013, 12:37 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 12:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9844:7983be7501e7
> ---------------------------
> cpu: clean up architectural register classification
> 
> Move from a poorly documented scheme where the mapping
> of unified architectural register indices to register
> classes is hardcoded all over to one where there's an
> enum for the register classes and a function that
> encapsulates the mapping.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/insts/misc.cc 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/arch/arm/insts/static_inst.cc 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/arch/power/insts/static_inst.cc 
> 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/arch/x86/insts/static_inst.cc 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/SConscript 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu_impl.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/inorder/cpu.cc 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/inorder/inorder_dyn_inst.cc 
> 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/o3/dyn_inst.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/o3/rename_impl.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/reg_class.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/cpu/reg_class.cc PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1981/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to