> On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:42 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/cpu/o3/regfile.hh, line 114
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1983/diff/1/?file=37203#file37203line114>
> >
> >     0 <=? Can it be negative?

It's typedef'd to 'short int', so technically yes, but don't ask me why...


> On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:42 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> > src/cpu/o3/regfile.hh, line 240
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1983/diff/1/?file=37203#file37203line240>
> >
> >     Is there a good reason these are not std::vectors? No need to 
> > change...just asking.

No good reason, just history... but similarly no great benefit to changing at 
this point either, IMO.


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1983/#review4622
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 22, 2013, 12:38 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1983/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 12:38 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9846:816e0d9e97a0
> ---------------------------
> cpu/o3: clean up physical register file
> 
> No need for PhysRegFile to be a template class, or
> have a pointer back to the CPU.  Also made some methods
> for checking the physical register type (int vs. float)
> based on the phys reg index, which will come in handy later.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/o3/cpu.cc 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/o3/cpu_policy.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
>   src/cpu/o3/regfile.hh 1ddfb0679c7569fb56382ac2187d6de038fd6f28 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1983/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to