> On March 6, 2014, 4:48 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > Too bad "assert_if" doesn't actually make sense, as it would be a nice 
> > parallel.  Can't say I really like the name "chatty_assert", but I don't 
> > have a better alternative.  I'll encourage others to suggest some though.  
> > If we can't come up with something, though, I'm fine with this as it is.  
> > Thanks for all the iterations!

I had "verbose_assert", "verb_assert", "vassert" on my list.  "Wordy" (and 
"verbose") seems to be on the more negatively connoted side of the spectrum.  
"info_assert"?  "expressive_assert"?


- Stephan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2164/#review4946
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 6, 2014, 3:25 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2164/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 6, 2014, 3:25 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10104:4d3c10cadce3
> ---------------------------
> misc: Add panic_if / fatal_if / chatty_assert
> 
> This snippet can be used to replace if + {panics, fatals, asserts} constructs.
> The idea is to have both the condition checking and a verbose printout in a 
> single statement.  The interface is as follows:
> 
> panic_if(foo != bar, "These should be equal: foo %i bar %i", foo, bar);
> fatal_if(foo != bar, "These should be equal: foo %i bar %i", foo, bar);
> chatty_assert(foo == bar, "These should be equal: foo %i bar %i", foo, bar);
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/base/misc.hh 24cfe67c0749 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2164/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All regressions pass (as it does not affect existing code).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to