-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2350/#review5297
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/mem/ruby/common/TypeDefines.hh
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2350/#comment4819>

    It would be nice to prune these as well and rely in the established 
uint64_t int64_t etc.


In STL all index types tends to be size_t. Is there a reason for not using that 
here?

- Andreas Hansson


On Aug. 16, 2014, 1:32 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2350/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 16, 2014, 1:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10294:b79de412799b
> ---------------------------
> ruby: remove typedef of Index as int64
> The Index type defined as typedef int64 does not really provide any help
> since in most places we use primitive types instead of Index.  Also, the name
> Index is very generic that it does not merit being used as a typename.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/Address.hh 79fde1c67ed8 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/Address.cc 79fde1c67ed8 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/TypeDefines.hh 79fde1c67ed8 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/AbstractReplacementPolicy.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/BankedArray.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/BankedArray.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/CacheMemory.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/CacheMemory.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/DirectoryMemory.cc PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/LRUPolicy.hh PRE-CREATION 
>   src/mem/ruby/structures/PseudoLRUPolicy.hh PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2350/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to